View the book

(~98 pg)Read Online
(4.0 M)PDF
(641.8 K)EPUB
(~98 pg)Kindle
(~98 pg)Daisy
(101.3 K)Full Text
(1.6 M)DjVu

All Files: HTTPS Torrent (2/0)

Resources

Bookmark

A comparison of nonlinear filters and multi-sensor fusion for tracking boost-phase ballistic missiles (January 2009)

Author: Kim, Kyungsu.;Pace, Phillip E.;Hutchins, Robert G.;Michael, James Bret
Subject: UNITED STATES. NAVY.; GLOBALIZATION.
Publisher: Monterey, California : Naval Postgraduate School
Language: en_US
Call number: ocn611582211
Digitizing sponsor: Naval Postgraduate School, Dudley Knox Library
Book contributor: Naval Postgraduate School, Dudley Knox Library
Collection: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink; americana

Full catalog record: MARCXML

This book has an editable web page on Open Library.

Description

Title from cover

"Prepared for: U.S. Missile Defense Agency"--Cover

"January 2009"--Cover

"NPS-CS-09-002"--Cover

Author(s) subject terms: Boost-phase Missile Defense, Impulse Modeling, IMPULSE, RF sensors, Multiple Hypotheses Tracking, Extended Kalman Filtering, Unscented Kalman Filtering, Particle Filtering, Unscented Particle Filtering, Multi-sensor fusion, Extended Information Filter

Includes bibliographical references (p. 77-79)

Technical report

This report studies two aspects of tracking ballistic missiles during boost phase. The first part compares the performance of several nonlinear filtering algorithms in tracking a single target: the extended Kalman filter (EKF); the unscented Kalman filter (UKF); the particle filter (PF); and the particle filter with UFK update (UPF). Measurements are range, azimuth and elevation. In the absence of measurement error, all algorithms work well except for the PF, which does not converge. With measurement noise (standard deviations of 10 meters and 1 degree) the EFK also performs poorly, while the UPF is the top performer (although it is also the most computationally intensive). The second part compares the extended information filter (EIF) with earlier work on track scoring to perform sensor/data fusion in a multi-hypothesis framework. Here we find that the EIF handily outperformed other fusion algorithms based on track scoring that we tested

Funding number: MD7080101P0630

Be the first to write a review
Downloaded 40 times Reviews

Selected metadata

Page-progression:	lr
Scanningcenter:	sanfrancisco
Mediatype:	texts
Shiptracking:	y0443
Format.extent:	ix, 80 p. : col. ill. ; 28 cm.
Identifier.oclc:	ocn611582211
Type:	Technical Report
Identifier.npsreport:	NPS-CS-09-002
Contributor.corporate:	Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.);United States. Missile Defense Agency.;;;;
Description.sponsorship:	Prepared for: U.S. Missile Defense Agency
Subject.author:	Boost-phase Missile Defense, Impulse Modeling, IMPULSE, RF sensors, Multiple Hypotheses Tracking, Extended Kalman Filtering, Unscented Kalman Filtering, Particle Filtering, Unscented Particle Filtering, Multi-sensor fusion, Extended Information Filter.
Identifier:	comparisonofnonl00kimk
Scanner:	scribe2.sanfrancisco.archive.org
Ppi:	350
Camera:	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Operator:	associate-tina-afoa@...
Scandate:	20130128182306
Republisher:	associate-karina-martinez@...
Imagecount:	98
Identifier-access:	http://archive.org/details/comparisonofnonl00kimk
Identifier-ark:	ark:/13960/t9f490j84
Ocr:	ABBYY FineReader 8.0
Sponsordate:	20130131